Labor market rigidity, social policies and the labor share: Empirical evidence before and after the big crisis
This paper provides evidence of the impact of three important and general policies shaping the degree of labor market rigidity on the labor share: welfare expenditures, government expenditures on active labor market programs, and passive labor market measures. It analyzes the impact of regulation, such as the intensity of employment protection, and evaluates whether trade unions and minimum wage institutions play a role in the relationship between all measures and the labor share. The labor income share has experienced a declining trend since the mid-1970s in most advanced economies, and the existing literature found little if no correlation of this decline to general labor market characteristics. However, the present paper finds that some institutions are correlated to the downward trend, depending on the welfare system adopted, and that welfare and employment protection counteract the decline. Moreover, many countries saw an upsurge in their labor share after the burst of the financial crisis. Evidence of whether the effect of the policies weakened or reinforced the labor share after 2007 is reported.
|Year of publication||Oct, 2017|
|Volume, Number||2017, 08|
|Website / Document||Visit|
Nieuwsbrief week 45 - 2017
- Labor market rigidity, social policies and the labor share: Empirical evidence before and after the big crisis, 2017. M.L. Parisi.
- The German employment miracle in the Great Recession: the significance and institutional foundations of temporary working-time reductions, 2017. A. Herzog-Stein, F. Lindner, S. Sturn.
- Young and at risk? Consequences of job insecurity for mental health and satisfaction among labor market entrants with different levels of education, 2017. K. Klug.
- Structural labour market reforms, GDP growth and the functional distribution of income, 2017. E. Brancaccio, N. Garbellini, R. Giammetti.
- Spanish validation of the Job Insecurity Scale JIS-8: Viability of the cognitive and affective model, 2017. J.A. Llosa, S. Menéndez-Espina, J. Rodríguez-Suárez, E. Agulló-Tomás, J. Boada-Grau.
- Is wettelijke regulering de oorzaak van de groei van flexibel werk in Nederland? 2017. P.T. de Beer, E. Verhulp.
- De toekomst van vakmanschap, 2017. M. Buisman, R. van der Velden (Red.).
- Werken met flextensie, 2017. S. Peels, M. Engelen.
- Sociale zekerheid en arbeidsmarkt in het Regeerakkoord, 2017. P. Koning.
- Mededingingsrecht en de zzp-er: Een economische analyse, 2017. A. van den Born, E. van Damme, A. van Witteloostuijn.